Based on the provided benchmark data for two different conditions or scenarios (let's call them Scenario A and Benchmark), here are some key insights: ### General Overview: - **Scenario A** appears to have higher performance metrics in terms of FPS/frame time, but also shows elevated temperatures. - **Benchmark** is likely a standardized test condition that provides baseline performance measurements. ### Detailed Analysis: #### CPU Performance: - **CPU Load**: Both scenarios report 100% CPU load. This suggests the system is under full utilization, which may not be ideal for prolonged use due to heat concerns and potential hardware stress. #### GPU Performance: - **GPU Core Clocks & Power Usage**: - In Scenario A, the GPU core clock averages at ~1054 MHz (with a variance of ~299kHz), while in Benchmark, it's lower (~1036 MHz with a variance of ~287kHz). - The power usage for both scenarios is quite similar, indicating that the energy consumption remains fairly constant. - **GPU Temperature**: - Scenario A has an average GPU temperature around 63°C compared to 64.5°C in Benchmark, suggesting slightly higher temperatures in Benchmark but still within acceptable operational ranges. #### VRAM Usage and Clock Speeds: - Both scenarios indicate that the VRAM is fully utilized at ~1.4 GB, with no significant variance between the two. ### System Load & Temperatures: - **CPU Temperature**: - Scenario A has an average CPU temperature around 92°C compared to 87°C in Benchmark. This indicates significantly higher temperatures in Scenario A. #### Frame Time and FPS: - **Frame Time**: - In Scenario A, the median frame time is 1.61 seconds (330 ms per frame), while in Benchmark, it's around 1.62 seconds (497 ms per frame). This suggests a slight performance advantage in Scenario A. - **FPS**: - Based on the frame times and considering FPS as the inverse of frame time, Scenario A achieves slightly higher frames per second (higher than 50 FPS) compared to Benchmark (~36 FPS). ### Recommendations: 1. **Cooling Solutions**: Given the high temperatures observed in both scenarios, especially during prolonged usage like Scenario A, consider improved cooling solutions such as better thermal paste or additional fans. 2. **Performance Tweaking**: - Reduce CPU and GPU loads if not critical for application performance to maintain lower temperatures and extend hardware lifespan. 3. **Monitoring**: Continuously monitor system temperatures during extended periods of high load (like gaming) to ensure they do not exceed manufacturer’s maximum operating temperatures. ### Conclusion: Scenario A demonstrates better real-time performance metrics, but at the expense of increased thermal stress on both CPU and GPU compared to Benchmark conditions. Balancing between performance and longevity is crucial for sustained operation without risking hardware damage due to overheating.