## Top runs - Highest FPS: `lavd` with around 1% higher average FPS than the other runs. - Smoothest FPS: `bpfland-c0-t0-k` with the lowest standard deviation and variance among all runs. - Best overall: `lavd` due to its highest FPS with only slightly greater variance compared to the smoothest run. ## Issues - `asdf` performed around 15%-25% worse in lowest FPS compared to others. Given that all hardware and software configurations match, this could suggest an anomaly or inefficiency affecting this specific run. ## Summary Overall, the five runs demonstrate largely consistent performance on identical hardware and software setups. `lavd` provided the highest average FPS while `bpfland-c0-t0-k` delivered the smoothest FPS. `asdf` showed a significant drop in the lowest FPS, indicating a potential issue with its performance. Other metrics such as CPU and GPU load, temperatures, and clock speeds were comparable across the runs, suggesting the anomaly in `asdf` might be due to other factors not captured in the provided data.