## Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `bpfland-main` with an average FPS that is 4% higher than `bpfland-next`. - **Smoothest FPS**: `bpfland-next` with the lowest standard deviation of FPS, resulting in a 16% smoother performance compared to `bpfland-main`. - **Best overall**: `bpfland-main` as it offers a higher FPS and only a slightly increased FPS variability (15% higher variance), making it the best balance between performance and stability. ## Issues - **bpfland-next** has a noticeably lower FPS, about 4% less on average compared to `bpfland-main`. Despite using the same hardware and software, this run has an FPS drop and increased variability, making it less consistent. This is an actual issue with its FPS. ## Summary The benchmark on the Steam Deck LCD 512GB with CachyOS for both runs (`bpfland-main` and `bpfland-next`) shows a clear performance difference. While both runs operated under the same hardware and software environment, `bpfland-main` shows a superior average FPS—about 4% higher—making it stand out as the highest-performing run. The variability in FPS is also slightly higher in `bpfland-main` by around 15%, but it falls within acceptable limits. Conversely, `bpfland-next`, although smoother with 16% less FPS variability, falls short on average FPS and has significant stability issues, making it less favorable. The lower and inconsistent FPS in `bpfland-next` highlights an underlying performance issue that merits further investigation. Overall, `bpfland-main` is preferred for balancing both performance and stability.