## Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `bpfland-defaults` - **Smoothest FPS**: `asdf-defaults` - **Best overall**: `bpfland-defaults` ## Issues - `rusty-defaults` shows a significantly lower FPS at the lowest frame points and an unusually high FPS at the highest points. The median frame time is highly skewed, affecting the overall stability indicating an issue with the FPS. ## Summary All benchmarks were conducted using the same hardware and software environment, focusing on FPS performance and stability. The top-performing run in terms of highest average FPS was `bpfland-defaults`, and the smoothest run with the lowest variance was `asdf-defaults`. However, `bpfland-defaults` was deemed the best overall due to its combination of high FPS and consistent performance. On the other hand, `rusty-defaults` faced significant issues with FPS stability, possibly affecting the reliability of the gaming experience. The rest of the runs showed minor differences in performance either in FPS or in stability but were comparable in overall performance.