### Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `bpfland-defaults` has the highest average FPS. - **Smoothest FPS**: `asdf-defaults` has the smoothest FPS with the lowest standard deviation and variance. - **Best overall**: `bpfland-defaults` offers the best overall performance with the highest FPS and a stability close to the smoothest run. ### Issues - **lavd-defaults** and **rusty-defaults**: These runs showed significant outliers with the lowest FPS values essentially dropping to zero in some frames, which is problematic. This run also exhibited extremely high variance in frame times, suggesting serious instability and potential performance issues. ### Summary The benchmark was performed using the same hardware and software across all runs, with each configuration employing the same CPU, GPU, and RAM specifications. `asdf-defaults`, `bpfland-defaults`, and `BORE` have comparable FPS values, but `bpfland-defaults` stands out with the highest FPS. `asdf-defaults` was the smoothest in terms of FPS, presenting the lowest variance and standard deviation. On the other hand, runs `lavd-defaults` and `rusty-defaults` showed significant performance issues with severe drops to zero FPS and extreme frame time variability. These issues could indicate serious performance instability, making them unsuitable for consistent gaming experiences. Overall, `bpfland-defaults` delivers the best balance of high FPS and stability, while `asdf-defaults` notably excels in smooth frame pacing.