### Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `bpfland-next` — This run had the highest average FPS, outperforming `bpfland-main` by a small margin. - **Smoothest FPS**: `bpfland-main` — This run had the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating the smoothest performance. - **Best overall**: `bpfland-next` — Despite having a slightly higher FPS variance, the higher average FPS makes it the best overall performer. ### Summary Both runs, `bpfland-main` and `bpfland-next`, were conducted on the same hardware and software configurations, ensuring a valid comparison. The `bpfland-next` run achieved marginally higher average FPS, while `bpfland-main` had better stability with lower FPS variance. Overall, there were no significant performance issues observed, allowing for a straightforward comparison. `bpfland-next` is the best overall due to its higher FPS, while `bpfland-main` is the smoothest performer.