### Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `bpfland-main` - Highest average FPS compared to all other runs. - **Smoothest FPS**: `bpfland-next` - Lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS among all runs. - **Best overall**: `bpfland-main` - Despite having a slightly higher standard deviation in FPS, it compensates with a significantly higher average FPS compared to `bpfland-next`. ### Issues - **bpfland-next**: - The FPS registered the lowest value, which is significantly lower compared to other runs. - This run also had an unusual frame time peak, indicating potential stability issues, but the exact hardware/software settings stayed consistent. ### Summary Upon reviewing the benchmark data, `bpfland-main` emerged as the leader in terms of both highest average FPS and overall performance, although it had a slightly higher FPS variance compared to `bpfland-next`. The latter scored in terms of smoothest FPS but suffered from a significant low FPS value which brings its overall performance into question. Both runs operated under the same hardware and software configurations, indicating that the encounter might be due to environmental factors or transient system states. Overall, `bpfland-main` stands out as the best performer in this benchmark.