### Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `bpfland-defaults` with an average FPS that is approximately 4% higher than the other run. - **Smoothest FPS**: `asdf-defaults` with the lowest standard deviation and variance of FPS, which are around 15% lower than the other run. - **Best overall**: `bpfland-defaults` due to the significantly higher average FPS with only a slight increase in FPS variance. ### Summary Both benchmarks were run on the exact same hardware and software configuration, ensuring a fair comparison. The `bpfland-defaults` run has a superior average FPS, about 4% higher, making it the top performer. However, it has an approximately 15% higher FPS variance compared to `asdf-defaults`, which indicates less stability. The `asdf-defaults` run, while having a slightly lower average FPS, shows more consistent performance with lower FPS variance. No significant issues were detected in either run, suggesting that both configurations are well-optimized for performance.