## Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `asdf-defaults` with an average FPS of 4% higher than `bpfland-defaults`. - **Smoothest FPS**: `asdf-defaults` with the lowest standard deviation in FPS by approximately 3%. - **Best overall**: `asdf-defaults` as it balances high FPS and low FPS variance. ## Issues - **bpfland-defaults**: The mean FPS is approximately 4% lower than `asdf-defaults`, and the lowest FPS is roughly 14% lower, indicating poorer performance. ## Summary Both runs were executed on identical hardware and software, helping ensure a fair comparison. `asdf-defaults` outperformed `bpfland-defaults` on key metrics, with an average FPS approximately 4% higher and a smoother frame rate by around 3%. In contrast, `bpfland-defaults` showed significant performance dips with its lowest FPS being about 14% lower. Overall, `asdf-defaults` demonstrated superior performance and stability, making it the clear winner in this benchmark.