## Top runs - `Highest FPS`: `bpfland-defaults` has the highest average FPS, outperforming `asdf-defaults` by approximately 4%. - `Smoothest FPS`: `asdf-defaults` has the smoothest FPS, with a standard deviation nearly 14% lower than `bpfland-defaults`. - `Best overall`: `bpfland-defaults` is deemed the best overall due to its highest FPS. While it has slightly higher variability in FPS compared to `asdf-defaults`, the performance gain outweighs the slight instability. ## Summary Both `asdf-defaults` and `bpfland-defaults` runs were executed on identical hardware, using the same software environment. `bpfland-defaults` achieves approximately 4% higher FPS than `asdf-defaults`, making it the top performer in terms of raw FPS. However, `asdf-defaults` provides a nearly 14% smoother experience, as indicated by its lower standard deviation in FPS. No significant issues were detected in either run, ensuring both models ran the benchmark reliably. The main difference lies in the balance between FPS performance and stability, with `bpfland-defaults` favoring higher FPS and `asdf-defaults` offering smoother gameplay.