## Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `bpfland-defaults` achieved the highest average FPS among runs. - **Smoothest FPS**: `BORE` demonstrated the smoothest FPS with the lowest standard deviation in FPS. - **Best overall**: `bpfland-c0-t0-k` is the best overall, balancing high average FPS with low variance. ## Issues - **BORE**: This run had a significantly lower average FPS compared to other benchmarks, with a decrease of approximately 6% to 9% lower than the others. This divergence occurred despite the same hardware and software specifications, indicating a potential issue with this specific run. ## Summary All runs utilized the same hardware and software setup, ensuring consistency across the benchmarks. While most runs demonstrated similar FPS and stability, `BORE` showed a considerable drop in average FPS, suggesting an underlying issue. In terms of performance, `bpfland-defaults` led in average FPS, whereas `BORE` excelled in smoothness. However, the best overall balance of performance and stability was observed in the `bpfland-c0-t0-k` run, which managed to achieve high FPS with minimal variance.