## Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `lavd-defaults` with an average FPS that is higher than other runs. - **Smoothest FPS**: `asdf-defaults` with the lowest standard deviation and variance of FPS values. - **Best overall**: `asdf-defaults` provides a good balance with the lowest variance while maintaining a high average FPS, making it the best overall. ## Issues - **BORE** shows notable performance issues compared to other runs. Average FPS is significantly lower, with a mean FPS decrease of more than 5%. The frame time and FPS variability are higher, indicating less stability. ## Summary The provided benchmark data reveals that all runs utilize the same `OS` (CachyOS) and `hardware`. Most runs have similar performance metrics in terms of FPS and stability. However, `BORE` stands out with significantly lower FPS and higher frame time variability, which could be attributed to hardware/software setups not performing optimally, as indicated by the relatively higher CPU load variance. `asdf-defaults` run exhibits the smoothest gameplay experience with the least variation in FPS, while `lavd-defaults` achieves the highest mean FPS. Overall, `asdf-defaults` is considered the best for a balanced and consistent experience, while `BORE` needs attention due to its underperformance.