## Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `lavd-defaults` with an average FPS significantly higher than the majority of other runs. - **Smoothest FPS**: `bpfland-defaults` with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS. - **Best overall**: `asdf-defaults`, balancing a high average FPS with strong stability. ## Issues - **rusty-defaults** had a significantly lower lowest FPS compared to other runs, suggesting stability issues despite having comparable average FPS. ## Summary The benchmark dataset includes six runs, all conducted with the same hardware and software configuration. The `asdf-defaults` and `lavd-defaults` runs stood out with the highest FPS performances. Of these, `lavd-defaults` had the highest FPS, and `asdf-defaults` showed good balance between FPS and stability. `bpfland-defaults` was the smoothest run given its low FPS variance. However, `rusty-defaults` showed a noticeably lower lowest FPS, indicating potential instability. This anomaly could be tied to load distribution or momentary performance dips. While the overall trend showed similar performance across runs, slight variances in CPU load and clock speeds point to nuanced differences in handling the benchmark tasks.