Top runs

• Highest FPS: asdf-defaults achieved the highest average FPS, outperforming other runs by approximately 6%.
• Smoothest FPS: BORE had the smoothest FPS with the lowest standard deviation and variance, making its performance more consistent.
• Best overall: asdf-defaults is the best overall due to its highest FPS, despite only a slightly higher variation in FPS. It is superior to other runs in both performance and stability.

Summary

All benchmarks were conducted on the same hardware and software setup, which ensures consistency in the comparisons. While asdf-defaults led in FPS, BORE was the smoothest in terms of FPS consistency. Notably, BORE had around 6% lower FPS on average but significantly lower FPS variation. The remaining runs, including bpfland-c0-t0-k, bpfland-defaults, lavd-defaults, and rusty-defaults, showed similar performance and stability profiles, with variations within a close range. The only noteworthy issue was with BORE, which had lower FPS while maintaining hardware and software consistency. This discrepancy could be related to differences in CPU/GPU load management or clock speeds during the test. Overall, asdf-defaults would be recommended for best performance, while BORE is preferred for the most stable gaming experience.