### Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `asdf-defaults` achieved the highest average FPS, outperforming other runs by approximately 6%. - **Smoothest FPS**: `BORE` had the smoothest FPS with the lowest standard deviation and variance, making its performance more consistent. - **Best overall**: `asdf-defaults` is the best overall due to its highest FPS, despite only a slightly higher variation in FPS. It is superior to other runs in both performance and stability. ### Summary All benchmarks were conducted on the same hardware and software setup, which ensures consistency in the comparisons. While `asdf-defaults` led in FPS, `BORE` was the smoothest in terms of FPS consistency. Notably, `BORE` had around 6% lower FPS on average but significantly lower FPS variation. The remaining runs, including `bpfland-c0-t0-k`, `bpfland-defaults`, `lavd-defaults`, and `rusty-defaults`, showed similar performance and stability profiles, with variations within a close range. The only noteworthy issue was with `BORE`, which had lower FPS while maintaining hardware and software consistency. This discrepancy could be related to differences in CPU/GPU load management or clock speeds during the test. Overall, `asdf-defaults` would be recommended for best performance, while `BORE` is preferred for the most stable gaming experience.