## Top runs - `Highest FPS`: `asdf-defaults` with the highest average FPS. - `Smoothest FPS`: `bpfland-c0-t0-k` with the lowest FPS variance. - `Best overall`: `asdf-defaults` combining high FPS with relatively stable performance. ## Issues - `BORE` showed significantly lower FPS (over 10% lower) compared to other runs with similar hardware and software configurations. ## Summary The benchmark indicates that most runs exhibit similar performance in terms of FPS and stability, with only minor variations. `asdf-defaults` leads in average FPS, while `bpfland-c0-t0-k` and `lavd-defaults` are notably smooth with low FPS variance. However, the `BORE` run is significantly worse in terms of FPS, despite using the exact same hardware and software settings as other runs, suggesting a possible configuration or runtime issue specific to that run. The best overall performance balances both high FPS and stability, making `asdf-defaults` the top choice.