Benchmark #20

Download
Automated CP2077 benchmark at 2024-08-01 18:50:31 UTC

Automated Cyberpunk 2077 benchmark, on Steam Deck LCD 512GB, at 2024-08-01 18:50:31 UTC. For more information, see https://github.com/erkexzcx/FlightlessSomething-auto/actions/runs/10203847041

Submitted 3 months ago by erikas2

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
asdf-defaults CachyOS AMD Custom GPU 0405 (RADV VANGOGH) AMD Custom APU 0405 16 GB 6.10.2-2-cachyos-deckify-lto schedutil
BORE CachyOS AMD Custom GPU 0405 (RADV VANGOGH) AMD Custom APU 0405 16 GB 6.10.2-2-cachyos-deckify-lto schedutil
bpfland-c0-t0-k CachyOS AMD Custom GPU 0405 (RADV VANGOGH) AMD Custom APU 0405 16 GB 6.10.2-2-cachyos-deckify-lto schedutil
bpfland-defaults CachyOS AMD Custom GPU 0405 (RADV VANGOGH) AMD Custom APU 0405 16 GB 6.10.2-2-cachyos-deckify-lto schedutil
lavd-defaults CachyOS AMD Custom GPU 0405 (RADV VANGOGH) AMD Custom APU 0405 16 GB 6.10.2-2-cachyos-deckify-lto schedutil
rusty-defaults CachyOS AMD Custom GPU 0405 (RADV VANGOGH) AMD Custom APU 0405 16 GB 6.10.2-2-cachyos-deckify-lto schedutil
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` with an average FPS noticeably higher than others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `bpfland-defaults` with the lowest FPS standard deviation and variance, indicating more consistent frame rates. * **Best overall**: `BORE` as it has the highest FPS and reasonable stability in comparison to other runs. # Issues: * The run utilizing the `lavd-defaults` has a significantly lower average FPS compared to others, roughly 25% less than the highest. * The configuration featuring the `rusty-defaults` also experienced FPS almost 22% less than the leading setup. * The `bpfland-c0-t0-k` run shows lower performance with FPS nearly 20% less than the highest, further compounded by slightly higher variability in frame rates. # Summary This benchmark compares several configurations executed on the Steam Deck while running the Automated Cyberpunk 2077 benchmark. All runs used identical hardware and operating systems but varied in scheduler configurations. Specifically, the `BORE` setup demonstrated the highest performance with the maximum FPS, while the `bpfland-defaults` provided the most stable frame rates. Some configurations like `lavd-defaults` and `rusty-defaults`, however, showed considerably lower performance, indicating that these schedulers might not be optimized for such benchmarks on the tested hardware.